Providing clarification options
I want to provide a safe response, so I should ask for clarification and suggest checking reliable sources if the user mentions a rumor. I could frame it as unverified information and advise caution. I might ask if they want me to fact-check, summarize, write a post, or provide links. If no clear task is given, I should propose options for verifying the information. Offering to check reliable sources will help ensure accuracy!Asking for fact-checking approval
If the user wants me to fact-check, I might need to browse but should clarify first that I can't do that without approval. Usually, I assume the workspace is enabled for networking, but since there are no specific instructions given, I should confirm with the user.
Since the headline seems to come from a gossip source, it could be defamatory. I’ll encourage verification and keep my response concise. I can suggest verifying the claim and ask about their preferences for sources and timeframes!Requesting clarification and options

I want to avoid repeating the rumor but can refer to it as "该传言." Since the user already mentioned it, I can summarize the gist. I’ll respond in Chinese, asking a clarifying question and proposing options. I need to keep my response concise, so I'll structure it in a bullet list. A suitable title could be "求证与选项." Ultimately, I should ask the user what they want. Let’s go ahead with that!
这是个未经证实的传言,涉及真人名誉,建议谨慎对待。你想让我帮你核查吗?我可以做下面几种:

- 快速查证:检索俱乐部官方渠道、主流媒体与可靠记者报道,判断是否有权威来源
- 背景梳理:近期相关事件时间线与上下文
- 中立改写:在未证实前用更审慎的表述撰写一条资讯稿
- 持续跟进:有权威更新时提醒你
如果要查证,请告诉我你关心的时段/语言范围和你信任的来源偏好(如俱乐部官宣、BBC、The Athletic 等)。
