杭州承办世预赛票房破5000万,据估创10亿级别的综合经济效益(世预赛落户杭州票房超5000万,综合经济效益预计达十亿级)

   2026-01-25

Breaking down economic impact

I'm considering the ticket revenue of 50M RMB and its 10B RMB economic impact. I should illustrate how these multipliers work, like direct revenues from ticketing, accommodation, food and beverage, transport, as well as indirect and induced effects.

two

I should note risks of overestimating while discussing opportunities for the city, such as urban branding and sports industry growth. I need to clarify the statement about 1B-level effects, as it seems more realistic than the initial 10B estimate. A rough model might show 20x ratios as plausible.Creating a quantitative check

I'm working on a numerical analysis for potential attendance. If there are 2-3 matches with 40-50k attendees and 30-50% out-of-town visitors, with per capita spending of 1500-3000 RMB over a night or two, then I'm looking at around 66M RMB per match, potentially totaling 130M RMB for two matches.

客流

I need to include hospitality and media operations spending, perhaps totaling 50-100M RMB. After applying multipliers and considering risks like double-counting and leakage, I can suggest ways to maximize benefits, such as fan zones and improved traffic management.Offering a calculation tool

I’m thinking about creating a quick spreadsheet calculator or a Python notebook to run some scenarios. As a coding agent, I want to ask the user if they’d like a calculator and what assumptions they want to include. I should be concise and helpful, so I’ll present my thoughts in bullet points.

I’ll summarize key points, provide rough calculations, outline methods and data needed for verification, note risks, and suggest actionable steps. Plus, I can offer to build a simple model or sheet if they’re interested!

看点与结论

数据清单

  • 票房破5000万只是直接收入的一部分;“10亿级别综合经济效益”在大赛体量下是有可能的,但依赖关键假设(外地客占比、停留时长、客单价、媒体曝光估值、乘数系数等)。
  • 粗算路径能跑到约10亿:两三场高关注度比赛+较高外地客流+旺季价位+城市配套活动,可以把直接+间接/诱发效应叠加到十亿上下。

一个“算给你看”的粗算

  • 观赛规模:4.5万座×2场≈9万人次(含复购/黄牛不重复计)。
  • 外地客:35%×9万≈3.15万人;人均停留1.6晚;人均花费≈1800元(房/餐/交通/文旅)→约5.7亿元。
  • 本地观众消费溢出:5.85万人×300元夜间/周边消费→约1.75亿元。
  • 赛事相关B端支出:转播/制作、场馆运营、安保、临建、赞助接待、志愿者与物流等→0.6–1.0亿元(城市间差异大)。
  • 小计直接支出:约8.0–8.5亿元(含票房5000万)。
  • 乘数效应:本地I-O乘数1.2–1.5较稳健→综合约9.6–12.7亿元。
  • 媒体/品牌曝光:若纳入“等值广告价值”会进一步上浮,但这部分常被质疑,建议与现金流效应分开呈现。

怎么更严谨地验证

  • 口径拆分:直接效应(票、食宿行购、B端)、间接(本地供应链)、诱发(收入带动再消费)。
  • 反事实对比:用手机信令/OTA/酒店PMS数据对比非赛事周末的客流、入住、房价、停留时长的增量。
  • 本地化参数:用浙江或杭州市投入产出表/旅游卫星账户的分部门乘数,避免套用全国均值。
  • 漏损核减:平台抽佣、跨城供应商、替代效应(本地居民把原本消费换到赛事,不算增量)、拥堵挤出。
  • 数据清单:实名观赛去重人数、外地占比与来源地、平均停留/同行人数、酒店入住与均价、机场/高铁到发量、场外活动参与人数、商圈POS增量、场馆与转播成本明细。

常见风险与争议

  • 双重计量:票房与平台服务费、赞助实物置换重复统计。
  • 过度外推:把旺点商圈增量直接放大到全市。
  • 曝光价值等值与现金效益混淆。
  • 忽视替代与挤出,导致增量被高估10–30%。

如何进一步放大效益(下一场可用)

ul

  • 设计“过夜转化”权益:联票+地标夜游/博物馆延时开放,拉长停留。
  • 扶持场外官方同城活动(Fan Zone、夜市),引导消费集聚与可计量。
  • 与航司/高铁/OTA做赛事主题包,扩大外地客占比。
  • 引导媒体与短视频打卡路线,延长赛事热度到赛后周末。
  • 场馆周边临停/步行友好与分时疏导,减少拥堵挤出。

要不要我帮你做个可调参数的小模型?我可以用一份简易Excel或Python脚本,把人数、占比、客单、乘数等做成滑杆,代入你的实测数据就能实时看到综合效益区间。

消费